
For the previous installments in this series, I’ve profiled some of the most prominent established hitters in the game. Today, however, I’d like to look at a pitcher that has been a model of consistency and durability in recent years: Andy Pettitte. Although he will turn 37 this season, Pettitte only appears to be getting more durable with age. He’s logged over 200 innings in five of the last six seasons, including all four of his most recent efforts. Some might say, though, that decline is imminent due to his decline in ERA and his W-L records over the past few years. We know he’s going to be in that Yankee rotation next year, but beyond that, what can we expect from Pettitte in 2009?
Let’s start with the ERA. In his two years since returning to the Yankees, Pettitte has yet to post an ERA under 4.00, going as high as 4.54 last year. Looking at his FIP during this span, however, it appears that Pettitte is a much better pitcher than his ERA would suggest. Although his ERA climbed from 4.05 in ’07 to 4.54 in ’08, his FIP actually improved in this time, falling from 3.87 to 3.71. It seems clear that some external force is wreaking havoc on Pettitte’s success as a pitcher, and if you think about it for a second, I bet you can figure it out. That’s right, the Yankees’ horrendous defense.
Just how bad was their defense last year? As a unit, their ultimate zone rating (UZR) was 39.4 runs below average. Only the Reds and the Rockies were worse. To put that into perspective, their divisional foes, the Rays, were 70.6 runs above average – a whopping 110 run difference! Only two of the Yankees’ regular starters posted above average UZR totals, but both tallied those marks in left field (Damon had a UZR of 8.4, and Nady was 0.8). One reason why this hurts Pettitte in particular is because he’s a predominantly ground ball pitcher – 51.5% of the batted balls he allowed last year were grounders. He at least had an adequate fielding defense behind him in Houston, which is why his ERA was more reflective of his FIP during his three years there. This also explains Pettitte’s unusually high BABIP as a Yankee – last year his BABIP was .339, but in two of his three seasons in Houston it was below .300.
Perhaps a silver lining in this for Pettitte is the fact that the Yankees defense is likely to improve in 2009. Teixeira replacing Giambi at first and (probably) Nady replacing Abreu in right will be huge improvements. Cano also has a chance of substantial individual improvement – while he had a UZR of –7.3 last year, he posted a UZR of 8.1 in 2007. Not entirely sure what accounted for this drop, but it’d be hard to imagine it being this bad again knowing he has that high of a ceiling. It is important to note, however, that all of these possible improvements will be happening on the right side of the field, which may not help Pettitte that much. He’s historically much better against lefties than righties, so don’t be surprised if opposing teams stack their lineups full of righties against him. And because of he’s not much of a power pitcher whose velocity is already dropping (I’ll discuss this more a little later on), I’d expect a lot of the batted balls on Pettitte’s watch to head towards the left side. Bottom line: it’s hard to gauge how much the Yankees’ defense will hurt Pettitte again in ’09.
One thing that the Yankees’ defense can’t hurt Pettitte that much on is his strikeout totals. Pettitte’s never really been an elite strikeout pitcher – his personal best is 180 in 2003. The problem is, though, that he’s never been consistent year-to-year in his strikeout totals. It’s been since 1999 going into 2000 that he’s had two consecutive years where his K/9 rates have either risen or dropped by less that 0.5. Last year marked an improvement of 1.08 strikeouts per 9 (5.89 in ’07, 6.97 in ’08), but I have little confidence in saying that this trend will continue next year. His 6.97 K/9 rate last year was relatively close to his career mark of 6.60, so it’s at least reasonable to expect that he’ll post the same kind of strikeout numbers next year.
As erratic as Pettitte’s strikeout rates have been recently, his BB/9 rates have been relatively stagnant. They’ve slowly declined over the last three years, but they’ve still been hovering around or over 2.5, which isn’t great. Along these lines, his WHIP totals have been stagnant of late, but they’re still over 1.4. Keep in mind that his WHIP is also likely suffering from the extra hits that his defense is allowing, but his high walk rates tell me that Pettitte has little hope of being any more than a little below average with WHIP.
One other interesting thing about Pettitte, especially in regard to his age, is his pitch selection and velocity. Last year, Pettitte relied much more on his cutter than in recent years, throwing it 27.9% of the time in 2008 (up from 18.2% in 2007). This could account for the jump in strikeouts, and it could extend his positive trend if he keeps it up. One discouraging thing, though, is his decreased velocity in both his cutter and his fastball. For the cutter, his average velocity dropped from 85.2 mph in ’07 to 83.8 mph in ’08, and his fastball fell from 89.1 mph to 88.5 mph in the same stretch. A drop in velocity is a big tell for an aging pitcher, and this may finally be catching up to Pettitte.
Overall, expect Pettitte to be a little below average in strikeouts and WHIP with a potential to catch a break in his ERA (although I wouldn’t count on him getting below 4.00). The one area where Pettitte will carry the most value will be with his wins – pitching with the support of the Yankees’ lineup (tenth in runs scored last year, but could definitely improve this year with Teixeira and a rebound from Cano) will likely benefit him. It’s difficult to gauge Pettitte’s perceived draft value from mocks, as he only recently resigned with the Yankees. I think his talent is definitely on the decline, but he could add some good back-end rotation value for you if you get him in a late round. You probably won’t see me draft him, however, as I would rather spend that pick on a younger starter with more upside than an aging veteran with a lower ceiling.
By John Dorhauer
Read more...



